Miami Basketball Coach Jim Larrañaga Steps Down, Blames NIL Exhaustion

Miami basketball head coach Jim Larrañaga abruptly announced his intent to retire in the middle of the season, citing exhaustion due to new NIL rules. 

Jim Larrañaga, the architect of Miami men’s basketball’s greatest moments, has stepped down. The 75-year-old coach announced his decision Thursday afternoon, concluding a remarkable 14-year tenure in Coral Gables. Assistant coach Bill Courtney will take over as interim head coach.

Larrañaga departs as the winningest coach in program history, a legacy capped by leading the Hurricanes to their first-ever Final Four less than two years ago. This season, however, has been a struggle. Miami sits at 4-8 after a 15-17 campaign last year.

Larrañaga’s impact transcends wins and losses—a coach who brought belief, transformation, and lasting pride to a program now tasked with continuing his vision. But some in college hoops are upset with how he is leaving, while others say it could happen to more seasoned coaches soon. He built a Final Four squad using mostly NIL transfers, and now he’s leaving because he’s exhausted from transfers. People have a variety of opinions on Larrañaga being hypocritical of the NIL. However, one thing is for sure: the NIL and transfer system needs to change.

Check out all of our college basketball coverage! 

Larrañaga Says College Hoops Has “Become Professional” 

Jim Larrañaga’s departure mirrors that of Tony Bennett at Virginia, who also stepped away abruptly this season. Larrañaga transformed Miami basketball, leading the Hurricanes to six NCAA tournaments, including four Sweet Sixteens, their first Elite Eight in 2022, and an unforgettable Final Four in 2023. He also delivered Miami its first ACC tournament title in 2013.

Miami athletics director Dan Radakovich stated that Larrañaga asked to speak to him Sunday, saying he wanted to step down. The decision was finalized on Monday.

“Like all of us in intercollegiate athletics, there is so much uncertainty,” Radakovich explained. “The change in rules. Name, image, and likeness demands from agents. Unlimited transfers, et cetera. You can go on and on in these changing times. All of which takes so much time, effort, and energy away from actually coaching.”

Before his Miami tenure, Larrañaga spent 14 seasons at George Mason, guiding the mid-major to a historic Cinderella run to the Final Four as an 11-seed in 2006. He began his head coaching career at Bowling Green.

“At this point, after 53 years, I just didn’t feel like that I could successfully navigate this whole new world that I was dealing with,” Larrañaga, referencing name, image and likeness deals (NIL), stated to reporters in a press conference.

On Thursday, Larrañaga reflected on how eight players from last year’s Final Four team entered the transfer portal, chasing opportunities elsewhere. “There’s one thing you’ve got to constantly ask yourself: Are you going to give everything you have, the commitment that it deserves, 100% of yourself, physically, mentally, emotionally and spiritually?” Larrañaga, 75, said. “And quite frankly, I’ve tried to do that throughout my life and throughout my time here, but I’m exhausted.”

Jim Larrañaga on why he’s stepping down:

"I'm exhausted… What shocked me beyond belief, was after we made the Final Four, 8 of my players said they were gonna leave. You have to ask yourself, as a coach, what is this all about?"pic.twitter.com/KQ7mU5ykfN

— The Field of 68 (@TheFieldOf68) December 26, 2024

Times Have Changed in the Age of NIL

Jim Larrañaga’s reflections on his departure from Miami add to a growing dialogue about the shifting landscape of college basketball—one that Tony Bennett notably highlighted when he unexpectedly stepped away from Virginia. Bennett, revered for his tenure with the Cavaliers since 2009, stunned the basketball world with his retirement, citing the evolving dynamics of the sport as a key factor.

“This game, I think it’s right for players, student-athletes to receive revenue. Please don’t mistake me; I do. I think it is. But the game and college athletics are not in a healthy spot. It’s not, and there needs to be change. It’s not going to go back — I think I was equipped to do the job here the old way. That’s who I am, and that’s how it was,” Bennett had said following his abrupt retirement.

Jim Larranaga. College basketball legend. pic.twitter.com/3m9L9QhzIj

— College Basketball Content (@CBBcontent) December 26, 2024

The men’s basketball NIL market is now valued at $389 million, offering athletes unprecedented financial opportunities. But this comes with challenges. Players often leave established teams in pursuit of more lucrative deals, disrupting the foundation of programs built on loyalty and development.

Larrañaga joins the likes of Bennett and Syracuse’s Jim Boeheim in voicing unease about the NIL rules and their impact on the game. In a system now prioritizing deals over continuity, the soul of college basketball—the team-first ethos—faces an uncertain future.

Boheim sounded off on NIL.  “This is an awful place we’re in in college basketball. Pittsburgh bought a team. OK, fine. My [big donor] talks about it, but he doesn’t give anyone any money. Nothing. Not one guy. Our guys make like $20,000. Wake Forest bought a team. Miami bought a team. … It’s like, ‘Really, this is where we are?’ That’s really where we are, and it’s only going to get worse,” Boeheim said last year.

Is There an NIL Solution?

For generations, college athletes played the game while the institutions, coaches, and programs reaped the financial windfall. Millions upon millions earned, while players were told their reward was the “opportunity.” That imbalance cried out for change, and the advent of NIL rights answered that call, finally allowing athletes to be paid. But the system, as it stands, is far from perfect.

The nonstop carousel of players entering the transfer portal is a clear signal that something must change. Consider this scenario: A player signs an NIL deal, performs spectacularly, and suddenly, five other schools come knocking with bigger offers. Who wouldn’t leave? The system, as it exists, incentivizes this constant movement, leaving behind fractured teams and fleeting commitments.

The Top 20 #CollegeBasketball Transfers of All-Time. #CBB pic.twitter.com/j3Os3sD5R9

— College Basketball Report (@CBKReport) June 16, 2022

What’s missing are structures and incentives to promote loyalty and continuity. Imagine a system where NIL deals are multi-year commitments, rewarding players not just for their initial decision but for staying the course. Bonuses could be built in for earning all-conference honors, reaching the conference tournament, or contributing to team success. And those bonuses could be added to existing agreements in year two, giving players a reason to stay at their current program while rewarding them for their achievements.

Such a setup wouldn’t just foster team unity—it would encourage players to embrace the journey alongside their teammates, rather than perpetually chasing the highest bidder. Limiting transfers and enabling universities and collectives to craft creative, long-term deals could restore some balance, making loyalty as valuable as talent.